Key result
Surgical mitral valve repair after failed MitraClip resulted in similar intermediate-term mortality compared to mitral valve replacement (30% vs 27%; P=.90).
Why the study?
Percutaneous mitral repair with MitraClip is safe and effective, but some patients require subsequent mitral surgery for recurrence of significant MR, prompting evaluation of candidacy for surgical MV repair after failed MitraClip.
Is surgical mitral valve repair feasible and safe compared to replacement in patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation after failed MitraClip?
Comparison
MV repair vs MV replacement
Design
Single-center observational study
Authors
Loading...
Similar mortality after repair or replacement post-failed MitraClip supports individualized decisions; leaves open optimal strategy in larger prospective studies.
Observational (n=25)
No
Is surgical mitral valve repair feasible and safe compared to replacement in patients with severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation after failed MitraClip?
Absolute Event Rate: 30% vs 27%
p-value: p=.90
Surgical mitral valve repair is feasible and yields similar intermediate-term mortality to valve replacement in selected patients after failed MitraClip.
Rader et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation after failed MitraClip (n=25). Surgical mitral valve repair vs. Surgical mitral valve replacement was evaluated on Intermediate-term mortality (p=.90). Surgical mitral valve repair after failed MitraClip resulted in similar intermediate-term mortality compared to mitral valve replacement (30% vs 27%; P=.90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: