Key result
Epicardial fat volume was not independently associated with myocardial blood flow reserve after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcium score.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether a relationship exists between epicardial fat volume and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries.
Is epicardial fat volume associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Cross-Sectional (n=134)
Blinded analysis
No
Is epicardial fat volume associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Effect estimate: β=-0.0007
p-value: p=0.538
Epicardial fat volume is not independently associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction after adjusting for age and coronary artery calcium score in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries.
Univariate inverse association of epicardial fat with MBFR is hypothesis-generating; leaves open independent effect after multivariable adjustment.
Objective Epicardial fat (EF) is metabolically active adipose tissue positioned between the epicardial surface of the heart and the pericardium. We investigated whether there is a relationship between EF and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction (CMD) in patients presenting with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries. Materials and Methods This study recruited patients referred to cardiology clinics for assessment of chest pain who subsequently underwent assessment via CT coronary angiogram (CTA). Myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) was assessed using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Epicardial fat volume (EFV) was measured by tracing serial slices on CTA with corresponding Hounsfield units of −195 to −45. Results We recruited 134 participants with a mean age of 59.2 (9.8) years. CMD was present in 54 (40%) patients, and the measured mean EFV was 128 mm3 (96, 168). Fortythree patients (32%) had a coronary artery calcium score (CACS) of 0, 64 (48%) had a CACS of 1–100, 18 (13%) had a CACS of 101–400, and 9 (7%) had a CACS >400. Univariate regression analysis showed that EFV and MBFR had a correlation coefficient of R=−0.22, with a significant regression slope (β=−0.002, p=0.012). Multivariable linear regression analysis using MBFR as a continuous outcome variable revealed age (β=−0.012, p=0.011) and CACS (β=−0.003, p=0.023) to be associated with MBFR. EFV was not associated with MBFR (β=−0.0007, p=0.538). Model repetition with MBFR as a dichotomous variable (MBFR ≥2 or
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quah et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Chest pain with unobstructed coronary arteries (n=134). Epicardial fat volume was evaluated on Association between epicardial fat volume and myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) (β=-0.0007, p=0.538). Epicardial fat volume was not independently associated with myocardial blood flow reserve after adjusting for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcium score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: