Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 27, 2026Comparative Strategy

Strategic options for Baltic states to bridge the deterrence gap in Trump′s era

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VVViljar Veebel

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analyzes options for Baltic states to enhance security amidst challenges in NATO relationships, suggesting new strategic alliances.

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how Baltic states can effectively maintain deterrence and security in the face of reduced US support.
  • Analyzed political and strategic trends affecting the Baltic states.
  • Evaluated the implications of US military support fluctuations on regional security.
  • Assessed possible defense strategies, including weapon procurement options and alliance formations.
  • Increased concerns over a security vacuum due to potential US military withdrawal.
  • Recommendations for Baltic states to consider regional alliances and local defense alternatives.
  • Calls for urgent decision-making regarding military modernization and procurement strategies.

Cite This Study

Viljar Veebel (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a3f6772aea7db3c1953eefbhttps://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2026.2687576
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The security and deterrence policy of the Baltic states in 2014-20242024
  2. 2Keep All the Flawed Options on the Table: Europe’s Nuclear Future2025
  3. 3Debates on extended deterrence in the contemporary U.S. scholarly community2026
  4. 4Transatlantic Defense Cooperation in the Context of Russia – West Confrontation in Ukraine2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5SUSPENSION OF START III IN CONTEXT OF THE DETERRENCE THEORY2024