Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rhetoric scholars interested in the ecological thought, object-oriented ontologies, and new materialisms have turned their attention from what rhetoric is to how rhetoric is – as both ambient and infrastructural. These theoretical moves prompt methodological questions: How do rhetoric scholars notice that which goes un(der)noticed? How do we tune our attunements from foreground to background? This article attempts an aesthetic and ambulant methodology that re/tunes and re/turns conceptual-corporeal-empirical methods to play with the background relations in which beings always already find themselves. More specifically, by practicing phenology, this article engages with infraordinary elemental rhythms – in/visible seasonal dis/appearances. The methodological trick may be thinking-feeling rhythmically, ma(r)king other temporalities – moving among chronos, kairos, pheno, and aion – to invent newly available paths of (infra)being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jason Kalin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: