The study examines how different perfectionism types influence academic performance in first-year university students, highlighting motivational aspects.
This study examined the associations between perfectionism, achievement goal orientations, and academic performance among 1,028 first-year university students in New Zealand. Using latent profile analysis, four distinct perfectionistic profiles were identified: (1) High-Range Mixed Perfectionists with High Family Pressure (high Personal Standards Perfectionism [PSP], high Evaluative Concerns Perfectionism [ECP]), (2) Mid-Range Mixed Perfectionists with Moderate Family Pressure (moderate PSP, moderate ECP), (3) High-Range Mixed Perfectionists with Low Family Pressure (high PSP, high ECP), and (4) Non-Perfectionists (low PSP, low ECP). Profiles characterised by moderate-to-high PSP and ECP with elevated family pressure were more likely to endorse performance-avoidance and work-avoidance goals, whereas High-Range Mixed Perfectionists with Low Family Pressure were more likely to endorse mastery-approach goals and achieved the highest academic performance. Overall, these findings extend person-centred perfectionism research by demonstrating that not only the level, but also the source of evaluative concerns is critical. Specifically, distinguishing between internally regulated and family-driven evaluative pressures provides a more nuanced understanding of how perfectionism relates to students’ motivation and academic adjustment in underrepresented educational contexts, such as New Zealand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: