Retrospective cohort study reports bleeding outcomes in pediatric pulmonary embolism, highlighting risk factors and management implications.
Pediatric pulmonary embolism (PE) is a relatively rare but high-risk disease. There is minimal evidence to guide clinical management, particularly with respect to reperfusion therapies. Few studies capture bleeding outcomes to inform risk-benefit management decisions. In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we aimed to describe pediatric patients <21 years of age who received acute PE care at our institution, excluding those with comorbid cardiac disease. We described the PE risk factors, in-hospital management, and acute outcomes, including bleeding and mortality. Between 2003 and 2022, 175 patients met eligibility: 120 low-risk (69%), 44 intermediate-risk (25%), and 11 high-risk (6%) PE. Most (N=142) received anticoagulation alone; 29 patients received reperfusion therapy for PE, the most common reperfusion therapy was systemic thrombolysis. There were 34 clinically relevant bleeding events in 27 patients, including major bleeding in 9 (5%) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events in 18 (10%) patients. Sixty-two percent (21/34) of bleeding events occurred in patients receiving anticoagulation alone, while 10/34 (29%) occurred in patients receiving systemic thrombolysis. In the high-risk PE cohort, clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 73% and 45% died. Most patients with major bleeding had other bleeding risk factors independent of their PE-directed therapy. All-cause mortality was 4%, with 2% PE-related mortality. This cohort study highlights that reperfusion therapy is well-tolerated in select pediatric patients and rates of bleeding and death are high in high-risk PE. Future research should validate these findings with prospective, standardized bleeding outcome collection to inform management decisions in pediatric PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: