Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article proposes a philosophical perspective on quantum physics and myth, suggesting their complementarity in describing reality.
This article proposes a philosophical interpretation of quantum physics and myth as two complementary limit-languages of describing reality. Quantum mechanics is considered as a maximally formalized, impersonal framework for articulating the non-classical relational structure of physical reality. Myth is interpreted as an imagistic and experiential mode of engaging with a similar notion of wholeness. It is argued that the human subject, within a mythological ontology, should not be understood as an autonomous entity but as a relational node within a broader structure of reality. The article situates this proposal in relation to major interpretations of quantum mechanics, including the Copenhagen interpretation, QBism, and relational quantum mechanics. Author portal: https://sites.google.com/view/yermakov-orcid
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oleg V. Yermakov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: