Key result
Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation did not significantly improve mental health at six months compared with usual care in patients following infective endocarditis (MCS 44.6 vs 48.8 points, p=0.41).
Why the study?
Physical and mental deconditioning is common following infective endocarditis, but rehabilitation remains virtually unexplored in this population.
Does comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improve mental health and physical capacity in patients following infective endocarditis?
Population
117 adults with left-sided or cardiac device endocarditis
Comparison
12 weeks of exercise and psycho-educational consultations vs usual care
Design
Randomized trial
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Does not support routine cardiac rehabilitation after endocarditis; leaves open need for alternative strategies in future trials.
RCT (n=117)
Single-blind (outcome assessors and data analysts blinded)
Computer-generated allocation sequence with varying block sizes (1:1)
Yes
Does comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improve mental health and physical capacity in patients following infective endocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 44.6% vs 48.8%
p-value: p=0.41
In patients recovering from infective endocarditis, a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program did not significantly improve mental health or physical capacity, though the trial was limited by low statistical power and poor adherence.
Rasmussen et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Infective endocarditis (n=117). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care was evaluated on Mental health measured by SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at six months (p=0.41). Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation did not significantly improve mental health at six months compared with usual care in patients following infective endocarditis (MCS 44.6 vs 48.8 points, p=0.41).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: