Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper aims to perform a sensitivity analysis (SA) to identify the parameters that are most relevant to the drift ratio of bridge piers as a first step toward improving seismic resilience. The parameters represent seismic source and attenuation effects, structural geometric effects, site conditions, and column-scale effects. The SA is conducted through dataset-based exploration and by using an artificial neural network (ANN). Parameter relevance is evaluated using statistical metrics including the F-test score. Because near-fault recordings are scarce in low-seismicity regions, point-source stochastic simulations are used to generate synthetic data. Six datasets are created to train the ANN. The input variables include moment magnitude (Mw), hypocentral distance (Rhyp), average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil (Vs30), column height (H), column diameter (D), and column spacing (R). The output variable is the peak pier drift. The datasets differ in their H/D ratios and in whether local site effects are included. Six ANN models are trained to predict drift. The results show that Rhyp is the most influential parameter (F-test score = 56%), followed by Mw (32%), H/D ratio, and Vs30. The resulting ANN model provides rapid estimates of pier drift and supports preliminary assessment of bridge seismic performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Derras et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: