Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper completes the IABSE Task Group 3.1 benchmark framework by validating state-of-the-art numerical aeroelastic simulations against full-scale measurements from the Hardanger Bridge (main span 1310 m). A 5-minute non-synoptic wind record from Storm Tor (29 January 2016) is selected because it exhibits pronounced low-frequency variations of wind speed and angle of attack, conditions under which aerodynamic nonlinearities become important. Three independent time-domain numerical procedures are applied using a common set of structural and aerodynamic input data, including static force coefficients, flutter derivatives, and aerodynamic admittance functions. All approaches, in a general sense, adopt a band-superposition strategy: the low-frequency response is governed by a corrected nonlinear quasi-steady formulation, while the high-frequency response is obtained from a linearized unsteady model about the evolving low-frequency configuration. The turbulent wind field is reconstructed from bridge-mounted anemometers with corrections for deck-induced flow interference and structural motion. Simulated midspan accelerations and derived displacements are compared to measurements through time-history evaluation and quantitative metrics. The study identifies key drivers of agreement, including treatment of low-frequency wind fluctuations, sensitivity to modal frequencies, and uncertainties in vertical wind reconstruction, while showing limited influence of structural damping at high wind speeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diana et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: