Engineering Evaluation of the Buffeting Response of a Variable-Depth Continuous Rigid-Frame Bridge: Time-Domain Analysis with Three-Component Aerodynamic Coefficients and Comparison Against Six-Component Wind Tunnel Tests

Tall-pier, long-span continuous rigid-frame bridges are prone to wind-induced vibration due to their large spans and pier heights; during cantilever erection, the maximum double-cantilever stage has reduced stiffness and buffeting becomes more evident. Accordingly, a time-domain framework driven by three-component aerodynamic coefficients and their angle-of-attack derivatives is adopted. Code-based target spectra are used to synthesize multi-point fluctuating wind time histories via harmonic superposition, followed by statistical and spectral consistency checks. Buffeting forces are then computed under the quasi-steady assumption, mapped to finite-element nodes, and integrated in time to obtain global responses (displacement and acceleration). In parallel, static six-component wind tunnel tests provide mean force and moment coefficients and their derivatives for comparison. The results indicate that the three-component time-domain approach captures the buffeting features dominated by vertical and torsional responses. When pronounced along-span sectional variation and high angle-of-attack sensitivity are present, errors associated with the strip assumption increase, whereas the force–moment coupling revealed by the six-component data helps explain discrepancies between simulation and tests. These response patterns and error characteristics delineate the applicability and limits of the three-component time-domain evaluation for variable-depth continuous rigid-frame bridges, offering a reference for wind resistance assessment and construction-stage checking of similar bridges.