Why the study?
Endocardial ablation may fail to achieve sufficient lesion depth for epicardial atrial substrates, and the impact of barrier tissues on pulsed-field ablation from extracardiac structures is unclear.
Does pulsed-field ablation delivered across extracardiac barrier tissues achieve sufficient epicardial lesion depth compared to direct delivery in an ex-vivo model?
Does pulsed-field ablation delivered across extracardiac barrier tissues achieve sufficient epicardial lesion depth compared to direct delivery in an ex-vivo model?
In an ex-vivo model, PFA delivered from extracardiac structures can reach epicardial targets, though barrier tissues cause significant, tissue-specific attenuation of lesion depth.
Background Endocardial ablation may occasionally fail to achieve sufficient lesion depth for epicardial atrial substrates. Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) could enable epicardial targeting from extracardiac structures, but the impact of barrier tissues is unclear. Objective To quantify how esophagus, aortic root, and pulmonary trunk modulate PFA lesion formation compared with direct delivery. Methods In-vitro potato slices were overlaid with animal tissues. Energy was delivered using a multielectrode bipolar PFA catheter across three application subsets. We measured depth of irreversible electroporation (IRE), total lesion depth, and IRE surface area. Groups: control and three barriers; 60 lesions in total (n=15 per group; n=5 per subset). Results Barrier tissues reduced IRE depth versus control (4.05±1.27 mm): esophagus 2.04±0.33 mm, aorta 1.84±0.74 mm, pulmonary trunk 2.61±0.67 mm (all p<0.001). Total depth was comparable for esophagus (6.65±1.47 mm, p=1.0) and pulmonary trunk (5.55±0.96 mm, p=0.263) but lower for aorta (4.32±1.15 mm, p=0.001). Relative to control IRE area (1,560.48±180.31 mm²), aorta was smaller (1,226.82±247.43 mm², p<0.001), pulmonary trunk similar (1,537.69±125.95 mm², p=0.991), and esophagus larger (1,782.81±264.44 mm², p=0.028). Conclusion PFA delivered from extracardiac structures can reach epicardial targets in an ex-vivo model, with tissue-specific attenuation. Oesophageal tissue broadened the affected area with shallower IRE depth, whereas the aortic wall showed greater attenuation of both depth and area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fedorov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: