Why the study?
Variability in lesion formation with HP-SD and vHP-SD strategies under different biophysical conditions remains unclear, and evidence using a temperature-controlled catheter is limited.
Does vHP-SD ablation produce different lesion metrics compared to HP-SD ablation in porcine hearts?
Does vHP-SD ablation produce different lesion metrics compared to HP-SD ablation in porcine hearts?
Very high-power short-duration ablation produces shallower and smaller lesions than conventional high-power short-duration ablation, and its lesion volume is more effectively tuned by adjusting irrigation solution rather than temperature targets.
vHP-SD lesion data warrant clinical caution; leaves open optimal parameters for human ablation trials.
Background Variability in lesion formation with high-power short-duration (HP-SD) and very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD) strategies—especially under different biophysical conditions—remains unclear. Evidence using a temperature-controlled catheter is limited. Objective To compare HP-SD and vHP-SD while accounting for key biophysical variables. Methods In a preliminary study with the Qdot Micro catheter, lesions were created in four porcine hearts using two protocols: 40 W for 40 s and 90 W for 4 s, across target temperatures from 40°C to 60°C. After ablation, tissue was cross-sectioned to measure lesion metrics. Impedance drop, temperature curves, and steam pops were also recorded. Results vHP-SD produced shallower and smaller lesions than the conventional setting (90 W/4 s vs 40 W/40 s: mean maximal depth 2.0 ± 0.5 vs 4.9 ± 0.4 mm; mean lesion volume 42.1 ± 15.4 vs 160.6 ± 49.4 mm³). With the 40 W/40 s protocol, lesion volume increased more with half-saline irrigation, highlighting its strong influence on lesion size. Notably, target temperatures >50°C were not achieved with the 90 W/4 s protocol. Moreover, even at similar AI values, lesion volume varied by temperature target in the 40 W/40 s protocol (40°C vs 47°C vs 50°C with half-saline irrigation: 145.1 ± 23.5 vs 171.2 ± 6.4 vs 251.6 ± 41.1 mm³; P = 0.008). Conclusion Modifying the temperature target has a greater effect on lesion metrics with conventional HP-SD ablation. In vHP-SD, lesion volume can be tuned by adjusting the irrigation solution rather than by increasing the temperature target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: