Why the study?
LBBAP is conventionally delivered from the right ventricular septum, and the hemodynamic effect of LBBAP delivered from the LV septum compared to right-sided LBBAP had not been studied.
Does left-sided LBBAP improve acute hemodynamics compared to right-sided LBBAP in patients requiring pacing?
Comparison
L-LBBAP via temporary catheter vs R-LBBAP using permanent device
Design
Invasive acute hemodynamic crossover testing
Key result
Left bundle branch area pacing from the LV septum produced comparable acute increases in LV dp/dtmax compared to right-sided pacing (99.1 vs 72.1 mmHg/s; P=0.51).
Authors
Loading...
Acute hemodynamics similar for L- versus R-LBBAP; leaves open optimal site selection pending larger studies.
Does left-sided LBBAP improve acute hemodynamics compared to right-sided LBBAP in patients requiring pacing?
Absolute Event Rate: 99.1% vs 72.1%
p-value: p=0.51
Left-sided and right-sided left bundle branch area pacing produce comparable acute improvements in left ventricular contractility at the expense of right ventricular contractility.
Liew et al. (2026) studied Patients implanted with permanent LBBAP (n=8). Left bundle branch area pacing delivered from the LV septum (L-LBBAP) vs. Right-sided LBBAP (R-LBBAP) was evaluated on Mean increase in ∆ LV dp/dtmax compared to baseline (p=0.51). Left bundle branch area pacing from the LV septum produced comparable acute increases in LV dp/dtmax compared to right-sided pacing (99.1 vs 72.1 mmHg/s; P=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: