Key result
LV septal LBBAP produces comparable acute increases in LV dp/dtmax versus right-sided pacing.
Why the study?
LBBAP is conventionally delivered from the right ventricular septum, and the hemodynamic effect of LBBAP delivered from the LV septum compared to right-sided LBBAP had not been studied.
Does left-sided LBBAP improve acute hemodynamics compared to right-sided LBBAP in patients requiring pacing?
Does left-sided LBBAP improve acute hemodynamics compared to right-sided LBBAP in patients requiring pacing?
Left-sided and right-sided left bundle branch area pacing produce comparable acute improvements in left ventricular contractility at the expense of right ventricular contractility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute hemodynamics similar for L- versus R-LBBAP; leaves open optimal site selection pending larger studies.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is conventionally performed from the right ventricular septum. The haemodynamic effect of LBBAP delivered from the LV septum (L-LBBAP) compared to right-sided LBBAP (R-LBBAP) has not been studied. We assessed the acute hemodynamic effects of L-LBBAP and R-LBBAP. Methods Eight patients were implanted with a permanent LBBAP and underwent invasive temporary pacing and hemodynamic testing with measurement of the maximum rate of left ventricular (LV dp/dtmax) and of right ventricular pressure rise (RV dp/dtmax). R-LBBAP was performed using the permanent LBBAP device in situ and L-LBBAP was performed using a temporary catheter within the left ventricle. Results There was no significant difference in the mean increase in ∆ LV dp/dtmax compared to baseline between R-LBBAP and L-LBBAP (72.1 ± 128.6 mmHg/s vs. 99.1 ± 148.1 mmHg/s respectively; P = 0.51). Similarly, ∆ RV dp/dtmax did not differ significantly between R-LBBAP and L-LBBAP (-21.1 ± 22.7 mmHg/s vs. -22.8 ± 17.1 mmHg/s, respectively; P = 0.95). The mean QRS duration reduction was 25.4 ± 10.0ms and 31.6 ± 5.7ms for R-LBBAP and L-LBBAP respectively (P = 0.60). Conclusion Both R-LBBAP and L-LBBAP produced comparable effects on biventricular hemodynamics and QRS reduction. Both improved LV contractility at the expense of RV contractility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liew et al. (2026) studied Patients implanted with permanent LBBAP (n=8). Left bundle branch area pacing delivered from the LV septum (L-LBBAP) vs. Right-sided LBBAP (R-LBBAP) was evaluated on Mean increase in ∆ LV dp/dtmax compared to baseline (p=0.51). Left bundle branch area pacing from the LV septum produced comparable acute increases in LV dp/dtmax compared to right-sided pacing (99.1 vs 72.1 mmHg/s; P=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: