Why the study?
LBBAP and LOT-CRT are emerging forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy, but their comparative impacts on left and right ventricular hemodynamics required evaluation.
Does LOT-CRT improve biventricular hemodynamics compared to LBBAP in patients undergoing invasive testing?
Does LOT-CRT improve biventricular hemodynamics compared to LBBAP in patients undergoing invasive testing?
Both LBBAP and LOT-CRT provide comparable acute improvements in LV contractility at the expense of reduced RV contractility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No acute hemodynamic superiority of LOT-CRT; leaves open comparative efficacy in larger randomized trials.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) are emerging forms of cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to evaluate the impact of LBBAP and LOT-CRT on left and right ventricular hemodynamics. Methods Eight patients with LBBAP underwent invasive biventricular hemodynamic testing and temporary pacing using intracardiac catheters. The maximum rate of left (LV dp/dtmax) and right ventricular pressure rise (RV dp/dtmax) were measured at baseline, during LBBAP and during temporary LOT-CRT. Results There was no significant difference in the mean ∆ LV dp/dtmax between LBBAP and LOT-CRT (72.1 ± 128.6 mmHg/s vs. 72.3 ± 100.4 mmHg/s respectively; P = 0.99) compared to baseline. Similarly, ∆ RV dp/dtmax (mmHg/s) did not differ significantly (LBBAP -21.1 ± 64.3 mmHg/s vs. LOT-CRT -38.3 ± 74.7 mmHg/s; P = 0.64). The mean QRS duration reduction was 25.4 ± 28.3 ms vs 17.7 ± 23.5 ms for LBBAP and LOT-CRT respectively (P = 0.58). Conclusion Both LBBAP and LOT-CRT resulted in improved LV contractility at the expense of reduced RV contractility. The biventricular hemodynamic effects were comparable between LBBAP and LOT-CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: