Why the study?
Although LBBAP and LOT-CRT are both used to achieve LV resynchronization, their effects on RV activation remain unclear.
Do different pacing modalities (R-LBBAP, L-LBBAP, LOT-CRT) produce different right ventricular activation patterns in patients undergoing electroanatomical mapping?
Do different pacing modalities (R-LBBAP, L-LBBAP, LOT-CRT) produce different right ventricular activation patterns in patients undergoing electroanatomical mapping?
Left bundle branch area pacing and LOT-CRT produce different right ventricular activation patterns, which may have implications for right ventricular synchrony and function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RV activation differs by LBBAP approach; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) are both used to achieve LV resynchronization. The effects of these two modalities on RV activation is unclear.. We assessed RV activation patterns between right-sided LBBAP (R-LBBAP), left-sided LBBAP (L-LBBAP) and LOT-CRT using invasive electroanatomic mapping. Methods Eight patients underwent invasive electroanatomical mapping of the right ventricle at baseline, during right-sided LBBAP (R-LBBAP), left-sided LBBAP (L-LBBAP) and LOT-CRT, respectively. Temporary LOT-CRT was performed using a an intracardiac catheter placed on the endocardial left ventricular lateral wall and the implanted left bundle lead. Temporary L-LBBAP was performed using an intracardiac catheter placed on the left ventricular septum to achieve left bundle capture. Results Right ventricular activation patterns differed according to the type of stimulation. Right ventricular breakthrough activation site was predominantly high septal for LBBAP (6/8) and L-LBBAP (6/8), while LOT-CRT produced equal numbers of high septal (3/6) and mid septal (3/6) activation. Conclusion Both left and right sided LBBAP produced comparable patterns of right ventricular activation whereas LOT-CRT resulted in a differing pattern of RV activation that may have consequences to right ventricular synchrony and function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liew et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: