Key result
Pediatric electrical storm carries ~6% in-hospital mortality and high ventricular arrhythmia recurrence.
Why the study?
Electrical storm in children is an exceptional, life-threatening emergency with scarce management and prognosis data, leaving strategies often extrapolated from adult practice.
Cohort (n=49)
Yes
Pediatric electrical storm is a high-morbidity emergency often requiring escalation beyond pharmacological therapy, including ablation, neuromodulation, or heart transplantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights acute mortality risk in this cohort; leaves open optimal management pending larger prospective data.
Background Electrical storm (ES) in children is an exceptional yet life-threatening arrhythmic emergency. Data on its management and prognosis remain scarce, and therapeutic strategies are often extrapolated from adult practice. Purpose To characterize pediatric ES in terms of underlying diseases, acute management, and outcomes, and to identify rescue interventions associated with survival and recurrence. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 49 pediatric patients (median age 10 [3–15] years, 73.5 % male) admitted for sustained ventricular arrhythmia or ES across participating French centers (2015–2025). Clinical presentation, in-hospital management, and follow-up were collected from institutional databases and analyzed descriptively. Results Underlying heart disease was identified in 77 %, including dilated (12.5 %) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (10.4 %), arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (10.4 %), and long-QT syndrome (12.5 %); 19 % had idiopathic VT/VF. ES was the initial diagnosis in 48 %. Monomorphic VT occurred in 55 % and polymorphic VT/VF in 45 %. Syncope was reported in 72 %, and 59 % were hemodynamically unstable, including 23 % with cardiogenic shock. Amiodarone and β-blockers were the most frequent therapies (51 % and 53 %), with adjunctive lidocaine in 16 % and calcium-channel blockers in 12 %. Deep sedation and catecholamines were required in 58 % and 54 %, respectively. Catheter ablation was attempted in 31 %, and sympathetic neuromodulation in 8 %. Three patients (6 %) underwent urgent heart transplantation. In-hospital mortality was 6 %. During a median 1.9 [0.6–5.8] years of follow-up, ventricular arrhythmia recurred in 29 % and ES in 9 %, while overall mortality reached 4 %. Conclusions Pediatric electrical storm is associated with high acute morbidity and frequent hemodynamic compromise. Pharmacological therapy alone is rarely sufficient; ablation and neuromodulation are underused but feasible even in unstable patients. Heart transplantation remains a viable rescue option in refractory cases. Dedicated pediatric algorithms and earlier escalation strategies are needed to improve outcomes in this fragile population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alauze et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Pediatric electrical storm (n=49). Pediatric electrical storm was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Among 49 pediatric patients presenting with electrical storm, in-hospital mortality was 6%, and ventricular arrhythmia recurred in 29% over a median 1.9 years of follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: