Key result
Transvenous lead extraction using PISA achieves ~98% clinical success with low major complications.
Why the study?
Increasing CIED implantations have driven demand for safe and effective TLE amidst rising procedural complexity, highlighting the need for reliable extraction strategies.
What are the clinical success, complication, and mortality rates of transvenous lead extraction using the PISA technique in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Cohort (n=283)
No
What are the clinical success, complication, and mortality rates of transvenous lead extraction using the PISA technique in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
The PISA technique for transvenous lead extraction is highly effective, demonstrating a 97.5% clinical success rate and a low rate of major complications (2.8%) in a high-volume center.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports PISA in high-volume centers with caution on mortality; leaves open need for comparative trials.
Background The widespread implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has led to a growing demand for safe and effective transvenous lead extraction (TLE), particularly concerning device-related infection, venous occlusions and lead dysfunction. As procedural complexity increases, so does the importance of adopting reliable and adaptable extraction strategies. We present a comprehensive, single high-volume centre experience using the PISA technique — a rotational sheath-based approach — to perform transvenous lead extraction over a 10-year period. Methods This retrospective study included all patients undergoing TLE at a national referral centre between February 2013 and December 2024. Extractions were initially performed using simple traction as the first-line approach, and in all cases where simple traction was unsuccessful, the PISA approach for lead extraction was employed. Clinical and radiological success, complications, and mortality were analyzed. Results A total of 283 patients underwent extraction of 530 leads, with a median lead dwell time of 96 months (IQR: 48–144). The majority of devices were pacemakers (62.9%), followed by cardiac resynchronisation devices (20.2%) and transvenous implanted cardioverter defibrillators (15.9%). Infection was the predominant indication (74.6%). The majority of procedures were performed via a superior approach. Clinical success was achieved in 97.5% of cases, whereas complete radiological success was achieved in 92.9% of patients. Major complications were observed in 2.8% of the procedures. In-hospital mortality rate was 3.9%, with only one death (0.4%) related to a major complication (not intra-procedure). During a median follow-up of 39 months (IQR: 17-74), all-cause mortality was 22.3%. Of these deaths, 3.9% occurred during the index hospitalization for TLE, 6.4% within the first year post-procedure, and 12.0% beyond the first year. Rehospitalisations due to cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular causes were observed in 19.8% of patients throughout the follow-up period. Conclusion TLE extraction with the PISA technique is a high effective methodology, with favourable complication and mortality rates in patients with CIED. The implementation of structured peri-procedural protocols and a growing team experience may contribute to support a high-successfully programme.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magalhaes et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) requiring transvenous lead extraction (n=283). Transvenous lead extraction using the PISA technique was evaluated on Clinical success. Transvenous lead extraction using the PISA technique achieved clinical success in 97.5% of cases and complete radiological success in 92.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.8%.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: