Key result
Young males with Down syndrome exhibited a blunted peripheral vasoconstrictive response to lower body negative pressure compared to controls, with a significant group-by-condition interaction for forearm blood flow (p=0.037).
Why the study?
Does lower body negative pressure stimulation reveal differences in peripheral blood flow regulation in young males with Down syndrome compared to controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
No
Does lower body negative pressure stimulation reveal differences in peripheral blood flow regulation in young males with Down syndrome compared to controls?
p-value: p=0.037
Young males with Down syndrome exhibit blunted sympathetic control of peripheral blood flow in response to lower body negative pressure compared to controls.
May warrant caution during exercise in DS; leaves open effects on work capacity and CV risk.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) experience autonomic dysfunction, with reduced sympathetic and parasympathetic control. This results in alterations in resting heart rate and blood pressure and attenuated responses to sympathoexcitatory stimuli. It is unknown to what extent this impacts the regulation of peripheral blood flow in response to sympathetic stimuli, which is an important prerequisite to exercise and perform work. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in peripheral blood flow regulation in response to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) between individuals with and without DS. METHODS: Participants (n=10 males with DS and n=11 male controls, mean age 23.7 years ± 3.2) underwent 5 min of LBNP stimulations (-20 mmHg), after resting supine for 10 min. One minute steady state blood pressure and blood flow at baseline and during LBNP were obtained for analysis. Mean flow velocity and arterial diameters were recorded with ultrasonography; foreram blood flow (FBF), shear rate and forearm vascular conductance (FVC) were calculated using brachial blood pressure measured right before ultrasound recordings. RESULTS: Participants with DS responded differently (consistent with reduced vasoconstrictive control) to the LBNP stimulus (significant ConditionxGroup interaction effect) for mean velocity (p=0.02), FBF (p=0.04), shear rate (p=0.02) and FVC (p=0.03), compared to participants without DS. CONCLUSION: Young males with DS exhibit reduced peripheral regulation of blood flow in response to LBNP compared to controls, indicating a blunted sympathetic control of blood flow. Further research is necessary to explore the impact of these findings on exercise and work capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hilgenkamp et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Down syndrome (n=21). Down syndrome vs. Controls without Down syndrome was evaluated on Forearm blood flow response to lower body negative pressure (Condition x Group interaction) (p=0.037). Young males with Down syndrome exhibited a blunted peripheral vasoconstrictive response to lower body negative pressure compared to controls, with a significant group-by-condition interaction for forearm blood flow (p=0.037).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: