Key result
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is driven by ectopic expression of the DUX4 gene due to D4Z4 macrosatellite hypomethylation, making DUX4 suppression a primary target for emerging therapeutic approaches.
Why the study?
No disease-modifying treatment for FSHD exists, and there remains an incomplete understanding of its pathophysiology regarding molecules leading to DUX4 activation and downstream targets causing toxicity.
This review summarizes the current understanding of FSHD pathophysiology and highlights emerging therapeutic strategies targeting the DUX4 pathway.
Whilst a disease-modifying treatment for Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) does not exist currently, recent advances in complex molecular pathophysiology studies of FSHD have led to possible therapeutic approaches for its targeted treatment. Although the underlying genetics of FSHD have been researched extensively, there remains an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of FSHD in relation to the molecules leading to DUX4 gene activation and the downstream gene targets of DUX4 that cause its toxic effects. In the context of the local proximity of chromosome 4q to the nuclear envelope, a contraction of the D4Z4 macrosatellite induces lower methylation levels, enabling the ectopic expression of DUX4. This disrupts numerous signalling pathways that mostly result in cell death, detrimentally affecting skeletal muscle in affected individuals. In this regard different options are currently explored either to suppress the transcription of DUX4 gene, inhibiting DUX4 protein from its toxic effects, or to alleviate the symptoms triggered by its numerous targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schätzl et al. (2021) conducted a review in Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is driven by ectopic expression of the DUX4 gene due to D4Z4 macrosatellite hypomethylation, making DUX4 suppression a primary target for emerging therapeutic approaches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: