Key result
Hemodialysis significantly increased the conventional flow Doppler-derived LV Tei index, but did not change the PWTDI-derived LV Tei index.
Why the study?
Does hemodialysis affect the Tei index measured by flow Doppler versus tissue Doppler imaging in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure?
Observational (n=84)
Does hemodialysis affect the Tei index measured by flow Doppler versus tissue Doppler imaging in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure?
The PWTDI-derived Tei index is independent of preload changes during hemodialysis, making it a more reliable measure of myocardial performance than the conventional flow Doppler-derived Tei index in this setting.
Preload changes warrant caution interpreting flow Doppler Tei index; leaves open whether PWTDI version provides independent LV assessment.
OBJECTIVE: Myocardial performance index (MPI, Tei index) has been described as a noninvasive measurement of left ventricle (LV) function. Our aim was to investigate the influence of preload on the LV MPI obtained by pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging (PWTDI) and determined by flow Doppler waveforms in patients with end-stage chronic renal failure (CRF). The second aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the Tei indices obtained by both methods. METHODS: Eighty-four patients on regular hemodialysis (HD) treatment were included (mean age of 45.3 ± 14.5 years). Standard echocardiographic measurements, the Tei indices obtained by conventional flow Doppler and PWTDI methods, mitral inflow velocities, and mitral lateral annulus tissue Doppler velocities were measured immediately before and after hemodialysis. RESULTS: After HD, weight loss in patients was significantly revealed (predialysis 63.6 ± 13.3 kg; postdialysis 60.9 ± 13.0 kg; P < 0.001). Left ventricle and left atrium diameters were significantly decreased after HD. Transmitral E and A velocities decreased after HD. Although Tei index measuring by conventional flow Doppler method significantly increased, Tei index measuring by PWTDI did not change after HD. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional flow Doppler-derived LV Tei index is influenced by hemodialysis. However, PWTDI-derived LV Tei index is not influenced by hemodialysis. The loading status of a patient should be taken into account during the application of the Tei index to the evaluation of myocardial performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerede et al. (2015) conducted an observational in End-stage chronic renal failure (n=84). Hemodialysis vs. Predialysis was evaluated on Left ventricle Tei index (myocardial performance index) measured by conventional flow Doppler and pulsed-wave tissue Doppler imaging. Hemodialysis significantly increased the conventional flow Doppler-derived LV Tei index, but did not change the PWTDI-derived LV Tei index.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: