Randomized trial evaluates operational effectiveness of integrated vehicle-diver systems in disaster response, suggesting improved efficiency.
In this study, we quantitatively evaluated the applicability of an integrated operational framework combining a heavy-class remotely operated vehicle (ROV) with manned diving systems, including the surface-supplied diving system (SSDS) and self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA), under predicted tidal conditions at the Sewol ferry disaster site.A 31-day tidal-current dataset was analyzed to assess operational durations, phase-based deployment strategies, and personnel requirements.The results showed that integrated ROVdiver operations substantially expanded operational availability compared with standalone diving, increasing deployable time by 26.4% for SSDS and 54.7% for SCUBA.During neap tides, SSDS enabled long-duration deployment, whereas SCUBA maintained operational efficiency through rapid preparation and high mobility.Under spring tide conditions, the limited diving window made the heavy-class ROV the primary platform for search, inspection, and hazard-removal tasks.In this phase-based framework, sensor-derived information from the ROV supports underwater environmental assessment, target detection, hazard identification, and decision-making on the transition between ROV operations and diver deployment.Personnel analysis further showed that actual requirements were substantially lower than arithmetic estimates and represented only 6.6-10.1% of the Sewol response workforce, indicating the feasibility of coordinated ROV-diver missions.These findings provide a quantitative basis for developing standardized procedures and integrated command structures for large-scale underwater search and rescue operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: