Randomized trial evaluates balance training outcomes in adolescents with DCD or ASD, suggesting tailored digital rehabilitation may be effective.
Objective: To evaluate whether a 12-week adaptive exergame-based balance training program reduces total sway velocity during quiet standing more than dose-matched conventional exercise training in adolescents with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD).Design: Assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial protocol.Methods: Sixty-eight adolescents aged 12-18 years with clinically diagnosed DCD or ASD and confirmed balance impairments will be recruited.Participants will be randomized 1:1 to an experimental group receiving adaptive exergame-based balance training (AIRPASS XR system) or a control group receiving conventional exercise training.Both groups will complete 40-minute sessions three times weekly for 12 weeks, with matched intervention duration.The experimental group will use a real-time algorithm that adjusts task difficulty according to success rates and center-of-pressure parameters.The primary outcome is the change in total sway velocity, a sensitive measure of postural control efficiency associated with fall risk, assessed using a force plate during a 30-second quiet standing task from baseline (T0) to post-intervention (T1).Secondary outcomes include spatiotemporal gait parameters, motor coordination, balance under sensory-challenge conditions, and treatment adherence.Results: The study will evaluate whether the adaptive exergame group achieves greater improvements than the conventional exercise group.Conclusions: This protocol addresses key methodological limitations by incorporating performance-based difficulty adjustment and objective movement analysis.If effective, the findings will support individualized digital rehabilitation strategies for adolescents with neurodevelopmental disabilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: