⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

June 26, 2026Management Science

From Shadow AI to Governed AI Review: A Commentary on “Fighting Fire with Fire: Infusing AI into Peer Review to Sustain Quality Scholarship”

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to explore the role of AI in the peer review process to ensure high standards in academic publications.
Presented as a commentary on existing literature.
Discusses the transition from unregulated AI use to a more structured approach.
Highlights the importance of maintaining quality in scholarly publishing.
Suggests that proper governance of AI can improve peer review outcomes.
Indicates potential for AI to support rather than undermine the review process.
Emphasizes the need for clear guidelines to incorporate AI in academic practices.

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Implication

Commentary discusses integrating AI in peer review to enhance scholarship quality, suggesting important implications.

Abstract

This paper was accepted by Christoph Loch, commentary.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Zhenhui Jiang (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a40b9f361bb0a67205c6001 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2026.02442

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The Sound We Haven’t Heard Before: A Commentary on “Fighting Fire with Fire: Infusing AI into Peer Review to Sustain Quality Scholarship”Review · 2026
2Don’t Build a Better Fax Machine: A Commentary on “Fighting Fire with Fire: Infusing AI into Peer Review to Sustain Quality Scholarship”Review · 2026
3Fighting Fire with Fire: Infusing Artificial Intelligence into Peer Review to Sustain Quality ScholarshipReview · 2026 · 1 citations
4AI Peer Review: Founding Position PaperReview · 2026 · 1 citations
5Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review: A Bibliometric-Guided Thematic Review and a Task-Contingent Legitimacy FrameworkReview · 2026

More related papers

More Versus Better: Artificial Intelligence, Incentives, and the Emerging Crisis in Peer Review2026
Reflections on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Peer-Review Practices and Its Implications for Greener Scientific Evaluation2026
Humanising Peer Review with Artificial Intelligence: Paradox or Panacea?2024

More from Management Science

Conditional and Lenient Drug ApprovalsMon,
Disagreement and Bond PEADMon,