Randomized trial assesses glucose monitoring techniques in adults with diabetes and kidney failure, highlighting potential benefits of continuous monitoring.
OBJECTIVE There is a need for improved glycemia monitoring tools for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and end-stage kidney failure (ESKF). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This prospective, randomized, crossover trial compared the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) with capillary blood glucose (CBG) testing in adults with T2D and ESKF undergoing hemodialysis. The primary outcome was percentage of time below range (%TBR) <70 mg/dL. RESULTS The %TBR <70 mg/dL was not significantly different between groups (mean 1.17% ± 1.8 vs. 1.29% ± 2.7; P = 0.28). Compared with CBG testing, percentage time in range (%TIR) was higher (63.4% ± 24 vs. 54.5% ± 23) and mean glucose lower (173.6 ± 37 vs. 187.7 ± 38 mg/dL) after the rtCGM intervention, while percentage time above range (%TAR) >180 mg/dL (35.3% ± 25 vs. 44.3% ± 23) and >250 mg/dL decreased (12.3% ± 15 vs. 18.8% ± 19) (all P ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In adults with T2D and ESKF undergoing hemodialysis, TBR was minimal and not influenced by rtCGM use. Compared with CBG testing, %TIR and %TAR improved during the rtCGM intervention. Future studies are needed to confirm the benefits of rtCGM in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galindo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: