Comparative analysis evaluates hydrogen synthesis technologies from methane, indicating environmental implications.
This article provides a comparative analysis of the primary technologies for hydrogen synthesis from methane feedstock: steam methane reforming (SMR), partial oxidation (POX), autothermal reforming (ATR), and dry reforming (DR). The techno-economic indicators, energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and industrial application potential of each technology are examined. The prospects for integration with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS/CCUS) technologies, which have developed rapidly in recent years, and the concept of “Blue hydrogen” are discussed. The literature review indicates that SMR remains the most widespread and economically efficient method; however, ATR and dry reforming technologies are emerging as serious competitors in terms of environmental sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurbanov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: