Validates a questionnaire measuring eudaimonic well-being in employees, suggesting effective assessment of workplace mental health.
Work serves as a primary determinant of employee well-being. Yet research has historically favored hedonic perspectives—focusing on job satisfaction and positive affect—over eudaimonic ones. While both approaches are complementary, there remains a critical paucity of validated measures specifically designed to capture eudaimonic well-being (EWB) within the unique constraints of organizational reality. Many existing EWB measures are context-free or rely on proxy measures that fail to reflect psychological well-being in the workplace. To address this gap, this study introduces and validates euwellbe , a novel 21-item questionnaire. Drawing on Ryff’s model of positive psychological functioning and work design research, the scale conceptualizes EWB through five components: meaningful work, autonomy, mastery, relationship with colleagues, and relationship with supervisors. Using a sample of 884 employees, confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a satisfactory fit for this five-dimensional structure ( χ ² (184) = 678.24, p < .001, CFI = 0.944, TLI = 0.936, RMSEA = 0.059, SRMR = 0.059). All variables exhibited strong composite reliability (0.81–0.93) and sufficient convergent and discriminant validity. Furthermore, the results indicate that EWB in the workplace is a robust predictor of key outcomes, including job satisfaction and withdrawal behavior. This study contributes to the scholarly understanding of employee well-being by offering a theoretically grounded instrument for researchers and practitioners, effectively navigating the “conceptual quicksand” that has previously hindered eudaimonic operationalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yusuf Arslanparcasi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: