Key result
PAD is linked to ~74% higher MACE risk in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
PAD increases adverse outcomes, but its impact in ACS patients undergoing PCI and its incremental prognostic value beyond the GRACE score required evaluation.
Does the presence of peripheral artery disease increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=1,726)
No
Does the presence of peripheral artery disease increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Hazard Ratio: 1.735 (95% CI 1.281–2.351)
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 17.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) elevates the risk of adverse outcomes. The current work aimed to evaluate the influence of PAD in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) cases administered percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to determine whether PAD adds incremental prognostic value to the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) scale. Methods: To retrospectively analyze a single-center, prospective cohort trial, we consecutively included ACS cases administered PCI. Individuals with and without PAD were comparatively examined for clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a compound item encompassing all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and repeat revascularization. The added value of PAD based on a reference model was examined. Results: PAD was detected in 179 (10.4%) of the 1,770 included patients. The incidence rates of MACEs (40.3% vs. 17.9%), all-cause death (11.2% vs. 1.6%), cardiovascular death (8.9% vs. 1.4%), MI (8.4% vs. 2.2%) and repeat revascularization (30.2% vs. 15.2%) were all markedly elevated in PAD cases in comparison with the non-PAD group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for other confounding variates, PAD independently predicted MACE occurrence (hazard ratio = 1.735, 95% confidence interval: 1.281–2.351). Addition of PAD resulted in remarkably increased predictive performance for MACE compared to the baseline GRACE score (Harrell’s C-statistic: 0.610 vs. 0.587, p < 0.001; net reclassification improvement: 0.134, p < 0.001; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.035, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In ACS cases administered PCI, PAD independently worsens clinical outcomes and adds incremental value to the GRACE risk score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) (n=1,726). Peripheral artery disease (PAD) vs. Without PAD was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization (HR 1.735, 95% CI 1.281-2.351, p=<0.001). In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, the presence of peripheral artery disease independently increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 1.735).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: