Key result
PAD is linked to ~51% higher major bleeding risk in AMI patients undergoing PCI.
Why the study?
Peripheral arterial disease is linked to cardiovascular events in AMI, but data regarding its association with bleeding events are limited.
Does peripheral arterial disease increase the risk of major bleeding events in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=1,391)
Does peripheral arterial disease increase the risk of major bleeding events in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing PCI?
In patients with AMI undergoing PCI, the presence of PAD is independently associated with a significantly higher risk of both major bleeding and cardiovascular events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PAD warrants closer bleeding surveillance in AMI-PCI patients; hypothesis-generating for targeted antithrombotic strategies.
Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there are limited reports regarding the association between PAD and bleeding events. In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether PAD is independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events, in addition to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), in patients with AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We included 1391 patients with AMI who underwent PCI and divided them into the PAD group (n = 210) and the non-PAD group (n = 1181). The primary endpoint was total bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3/5. The secondary endpoint was MACE, defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure. Results: The median follow-up duration was 653 days. Total bleeding events were more frequently observed in the PAD group than in the non-PAD group (24.8% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis confirmed that PAD was significantly associated with total bleeding events (HR 1.509; 95% CI 1.056–2.156, p = 0.024) as well as MACEs (HR 2.152; 95% CI 1.510–3.066, p < 0.001) after controlling for confounding factors. Conclusions: PAD was independently associated with a higher risk of major bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. These findings suggest that PAD should be recognized as a critical factor in risk stratification for AMI and may affect individualized bleeding risk management strategies in patients with AMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ban et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=1,391). Peripheral arterial disease vs. No peripheral arterial disease was evaluated on Total bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3/5) (HR 1.509, 95% CI 1.056-2.156, p=0.024). Peripheral arterial disease in patients with AMI undergoing PCI was independently associated with a higher risk of major bleeding events compared to non-PAD patients (HR 1.509; 95% CI 1.056-2.156).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: