Key result
Adapted HADS-Indonesia demonstrates adequate structural validity and good internal consistency, explaining ~51% of total variance.
Why the study?
The study aimed to adapt the English-language Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to Indonesian and evaluate the validity and reliability of the adapted version.
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
No
The Indonesian adaptation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Indonesia) is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing anxiety and depression in the general population.
Supports preliminary 2-factor structure but should not yet change practice; leaves open need for confirmatory studies in larger samples.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to adapt the English-language Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to the Indonesian language and evaluate the validity and reliability of the adapted version (ie, HADS-Indonesia). DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June and November 2018. First, a translation and back-translation process was conducted by a committee consisting of the researchers, a psychiatrist, a methodology consultant and two translators. Face and convergent validity and test-retest reliability evaluations were conducted. Next, structural validity and internal consistency analyses were performed. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test evaluated the scale's test-retest reliability. A Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the correlation between HADS-Indonesia and Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) for convergent validity evidence. Next, a structural validity analysis using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and an internal consistency evaluation based on Cronbach's alpha was conducted. SETTING: This study was conducted in three villages in Jatinangor subdistrict, Sumedang Regency, West Java province, Indonesia; the villages were chosen based on their profiles. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 200 participants (male: n=91, 45.50% and female: n=109, 54.50%), with a mean age of 42.41 (14.25) years, were enrolled in this study using a convenience sampling method. The inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years old with basic Indonesian language literacy. RESULTS: (91, N=200)=1052.38, p<0.001)) indicated an adequate number of samples for EFA. All items' commonality was >0.40 and the average inter-item correlation was 0.36. EFA yielded a 2-factor solution explaining 50.80% (40.40%+10.40%) of the total variance. All items from the original HADS were retained, including its original subscales. The adapted HADS-Anxiety subscale consisted of seven items (alpha=0.85), and the HADS-Depression subscale consisted of seven items (alpha=0.80). CONCLUSIONS: HADS-Indonesia is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the general population of Indonesia. However, further studies are warranted to provide more sophisticated validity and reliability evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiksnadi et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Anxiety and depression (n=200). HADS-Indonesia was evaluated on Structural validity and internal consistency. The adapted HADS-Indonesia demonstrated adequate structural validity, yielding a 2-factor solution explaining 50.80% of the total variance, and good internal consistency (alpha 0.80-0.85).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: