A Nepali version of the HADS was developed and demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties for screening anxiety and depression.
Supports HADS screening in Nepali patients; extends validation to new contexts but leaves adoption open.
BACKGROUND: In several languages and settings, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has demonstrated reliable and valid screening properties in psychiatry. OBJECTIVE: To develop a Nepali version of HADS with acceptable reliability and construct validity for use among hospital patients and in the general population. METHOD: The original English version was translated into Nepali using a forward-backward translation protocol. Psychometric properties were tested by factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha. The translated scale was administered to three groups of adult in-patients in a university hospital in three trials, and to a sample of adults from the community in a fourth trial. Some of the 14 items were reworded reiteratively to achieve viable semantic and statistical solutions. RESULTS: The two-factor solution with anxiety and depression subscales eventually explained 40.3% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha was 0.76 for anxiety (HADS-A) and 0.68 for depression (HADS-D). All seven HADS-A items showed at least acceptable item-to-factor correlations (range 0.44-0.74), and full construct validity was achieved for this subscale. Item-to-factor correlations for six HADS-D items were also at least acceptable (range 0.42-0.70); one item (D4) had persistently low correlations throughout all trials, although construct validity was still satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Reiterated rewording of items guided by statistical testing resulted in a Nepali version of HADS with satisfactory psychometric properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Risal et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: