Key result
In patients with a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 5.0, interruption of DOAC therapy did not significantly change the risk of stroke, thromboembolism, MI, or mortality compared with warfarin.
Why the study?
Real-world data on the clinical implications of DOAC therapy interruption in hospitalized patients across various clinical settings remain limited compared to warfarin.
Does interruption of DOAC therapy compared to warfarin therapy increase the risk of stroke, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, or mortality in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
No
Does interruption of DOAC therapy compared to warfarin therapy increase the risk of stroke, thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, or mortality in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation?
Risks after DOAC or warfarin interruption appear similar in AF; should not yet change practice and leaves open need for RCTs.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the treatment of choice in thromboembolism prophylaxis for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, surpassing warfarin. While interruption of DOAC therapy for various reasons is a common eventuality, the body of data from real-world clinical practice on the implications of such interruptions in different clinical settings is still limited. We assessed complication rates from DOAC (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) interruption compared with warfarin in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of electronic records of patients hospitalized in Rabin Medical Center between 2010 and 2017. Incidents of anticoagulation interruptions for various reasons (including unintended interruptions) were collected. DOAC-treated patients were excluded if they reported non-compliance, and warfarin-treated patients were excluded if their international normalized ratio measurement on admission was subtherapeutic. Outcomes included ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 90 days of anticoagulation interruption. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 5.0 (IQR 4.0-6.0) in both treatment groups. The associated risk of stroke, thromboembolic complications, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality after interruption of anticoagulation was not significantly different between the 2 treatment groups. Selective comparison of patients who were well balanced on warfarin before treatment interruption to DOAC-treated patients did not significantly influence the outcomes. This study did not find a significant difference in the complication rate after interruption of DOAC therapy compared with interruption of warfarin therapy in hospitalized patients with a high risk of thromboembolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itzhaki et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation. Interruption of DOAC therapy vs. Interruption of warfarin therapy was evaluated on Ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality within 90 days of anticoagulation interruption. In patients with a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 5.0, interruption of DOAC therapy did not significantly change the risk of stroke, thromboembolism, MI, or mortality compared with warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: