Critical analysis examines state control of religious education in Kazakhstan, suggesting implications for secularism.
This article critically examines the mandatory course ‘Secularity and the Foundations of Religious Studies’ in Kazakhstan’s secondary education system, analyzing how state-sponsored pedagogy reflects a shift from post-Soviet liberalization to securitized secularism. Utilizing qualitative content analysis of mandatory ninth-grade textbooks and synthesizing frameworks of assertive secularism, the religion-state gap, and governmentality, this study demonstrates how the state utilizes curriculum ideology to manage public religiosity. The analysis traces how the 2011 Law on Religious Activity institutionalized a restrictive regime under the international branding of the ‘Kazakhstan model’ of interfaith harmony. By decoding textbook taxonomies of ‘traditional’ versus ‘non-traditional’ confessions and establishing regional benchmarks—particularly with Uzbekistan’s parallel trajectory—the paper argues that this curriculum functions as a defensive civic mechanism designed to preempt radicalization while establishing state authority over theological discourse. Rather than fostering open-ended pluralism, this pedagogical approach implants institutional vigilance within students. Ultimately, the findings contribute to global debates on how assertive secular states instrumentalize public education to construct self-regulating secular subjects and navigate the tension between constitutional neutrality and the active management of spiritual life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. S. Ukenov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: