Key result
Percutaneous coronary interventions for pediatric coronary lesions achieved high procedural success, though patients with coronary artery stenoses had a reduced 5-year survival of 62.5% due to severe ischemic myocardial damage.
Why the study?
Pediatric percutaneous coronary interventions are technically demanding due to small vessel size, and studies evaluating long-term results are missing.
Is percutaneous coronary intervention safe and effective for treating coronary artery stenoses and fistulae in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease?
Cohort (n=32)
No
Is percutaneous coronary intervention safe and effective for treating coronary artery stenoses and fistulae in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease?
Percutaneous coronary intervention is feasible and highly successful for pediatric coronary artery fistulae, but long-term survival in pediatric patients with coronary artery stenoses remains reduced due to severe underlying ischemic myocardial damage.
Small-cohort observational data warrant cautious interpretation; leaves open the need for larger prospective studies in pediatric cardiology.
Coronary artery lesions represent rare conditions in pediatric congenital heart disease and mainly include coronary artery stenoses (CAS) or coronary artery fistulae (CAF). Due to the small vessel size, pediatric percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are demanding and studies concerning long-term results are missing. In this retrospective study, we analyzed indications, procedural details, and post-procedural outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent PCI in our institution. For CAS treatment, procedural success was defined as efficient coronary revascularization with a significant improvement of coronary perfusion. CAF treatment was considered successful, when no residual shunt was detectable. From 1995 to 2020, 32 pediatric patients aged ≤ 18 years received interventional treatment for CAS (n = 24/32) or CAF (n = 8/32). Reasons for CAS were post-surgical (n = 15/24) or post-transplant (n = 9/24). Interventional treatment strategies included coronary angioplasty (20/43), stent placement (10/43), and a combination of both (13/43). In-hospital mortality occurred in 6/24 patients and late mortality in 5/24 patients leading to an overall 5-year survival of 62.5%. Early mortality mainly occurred due to post-ischemic myocardial failure. CAF occlusion was performed using coil embolization (n = 3), placement of vascular plugs (n = 3), a combination of both (n = 1), or a combination of coil embolization and a covered stent (n = 1). Treatment of coronary fistulae was successful in all patients with excellent post-procedural results and no follow-up death. PCI in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease can be performed safely and effectively. However, the overall 5-year survival probability of patients with CAS is reduced due to severe ischemic myocardial damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schleiger et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery lesions (coronary artery stenoses or fistulae) in congenital heart disease (n=32). Percutaneous coronary intervention was evaluated on Procedural success and overall survival. Percutaneous coronary interventions for pediatric coronary lesions achieved high procedural success, though patients with coronary artery stenoses had a reduced 5-year survival of 62.5% due to severe ischemic myocardial damage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: