Key result
Visual assessment of real-time echocardiographic images showed better correlation with surgical evaluation of aortic valve calcification (r=0.83, P<0.001) than stop frame assessment or GSMn score.
Why the study?
Does real-time visual assessment of 2D echocardiography improve the correlation with surgical evaluation of aortic valve calcification compared to stop-frame assessment in patients undergoing aortic valve or ascending aorta surgery?
Cross-Sectional (n=185)
Does real-time visual assessment of 2D echocardiography improve the correlation with surgical evaluation of aortic valve calcification compared to stop-frame assessment in patients undergoing aortic valve or ascending aorta surgery?
Effect estimate: r = 0.83
p-value: p=<0.001
Real-time echocardiographic evaluation of aortic valve calcification correlates better with surgical assessment than stop-frame visual or computer-based grey scale measurements.
Real-time AVC assessment may aid preoperative grading; leaves open prospective validation for clinical impact.
INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve calcification (AVC), even without haemodynamic significance, may be prognostically import as an expression of generalized atherosclerosis, but techniques for echocardiographic assessment are essentially unexplored. METHODS: Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic recordings (Philips IE33) of the aortic valve in short-axis and long-axis views were performed in 185 consecutive patients within 1 week before surgery for aortic stenosis (n = 109, AS), aortic regurgitation (n = 61, AR), their combination (n = 8) or dilation of the ascending aorta (n = 7). The grey scale mean (GSMn) of the aortic valve in an end-diastolic short-axis still frame was measured. The same frame was scored visually 1-5 as indicating that the aortic valve was normal, thick, or had mild, moderate or severe calcification. The visual echodensity of each leaflet was determined real time applying the same 5-grade scoring system for each leaflet, and the average for the whole valve was calculated. Finally, a similar calcification score for the whole valve based on inspection and palpation by the surgeon was noted. RESULTS: Visual assessment of real-time images using the proposed scoring system showed better correlation with the surgical evaluation of the degree of valve calcification (r = 0·83, P<0·001) compared to evaluation of stop frames by visual assessment (r = 0·66, P< 0·001) or the GSMn score (r = 0·64, P< 0·001). High inter- and intra-observer correlations were observed for real-time visual score (both intraclass correlation coefficient = 0·93). CONCLUSION: Real-time evaluation of the level of AVC is superior to using stop frames assessed either visually or by dedicated computer grey scale measurement software.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yousry et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Aortic valve calcification (n=185). Visual assessment of real-time echocardiographic images vs. Visual assessment of stop frames and grey scale mean (GSMn) score was evaluated on Correlation with surgical evaluation of the degree of valve calcification (r = 0.83, p=<0.001). Visual assessment of real-time echocardiographic images showed better correlation with surgical evaluation of aortic valve calcification (r=0.83, P<0.001) than stop frame assessment or GSMn score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: