Copper–alumina composite materials with improved electrical conductivity and tribological properties were developed. The copper–alumina composite materials were prepared by powder metallurgy using nano-Cu/Al 2 O 3 powder. The powders were deoxidized from CuO/Al 2 O 3 powder synthesized by coprecipitation using NH 4 HCO 3 as precipitator and CuSO 4 + NH 4 Al(SO 4 ) 2 as maternal solution. The wear test against 440C stainless steel was performed at room temperature using a ball-on-flat configuration with 300 µm amplitude at various normal loads ranging from 0.1 N to 1 N. The effects of load and mass fraction of Al 2 O 3 on the friction coefficient and wear loss were investigated. Results showed that the wear loss first decreased and then increased with an increase in the mass proportion of Al 2 O 3 from 1% to 5%. Minimum wear loss was found at 2% proportion, in which the electrical conductivity was 82% of the International Annealed Copper Standard. The friction coefficient of the copper increased slightly with an increase in load. By contrast, it first increased and then decreased for the copper–alumina composite materials. The wear loss of the copper–alumina composite materials is always lower than that of copper. The highest relative wearability is 3.13, indicating better wear resistance. The wear mechanism of copper is oxidation wear, whereas that for the copper–alumina composite materials is adhesive wear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: