Key result
DCB matches DES efficacy in CAD, cutting TLR by ~34%.
Why the study?
DCB treatment is widely used in CAD management, but limited meta-analytic evidence was available regarding its efficacy and risks.
Does drug-coated balloon treatment reduce adverse cardiovascular events and improve angiographic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease compared to drug-eluting stents?
Meta-Analysis
Does drug-coated balloon treatment reduce adverse cardiovascular events and improve angiographic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease compared to drug-eluting stents?
Odds Ratio: 0.66
Drug-coated balloons demonstrate comparable efficacy to drug-eluting stents in treating coronary artery disease, with potentially lower risks of myocardial infarction and cardiac death.
DCB offers comparable efficacy to DES with lower risks in CAD; extends RCT evidence for stent-free strategies in de novo lesions.
Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) often leads to myocardial ischemia and impaired cardiac function, significantly impacting the well-being and quality of life (QOL) of individuals. The use of drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment has become a widespread approach in CAD management. However, currently, there is limited evidence available for the meta-analysis of DCB treatment in CAD. Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and VIP Database, covering data from the inception of each database up to April 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding DCB treatment were meticulously chosen based on independent assessment of eligibility and scope by three researchers. Literature screening and data extraction were independently performed by two researchers, while methodological quality of the enrolled studies was assessed using the risk of bias (ROB) tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3. Results: Following the screening process, seven studies were included. Four studies demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 0.66 for target lesion revascularization (TLR), five reported an OR of 0.41 for postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), four indicated a mean difference (MD) of 6.03 in the degree of stenosis (DOS), five exhibited an MD of 0.13 for late lumen loss (LLL), five reported an OR of 0.33 for cardiac death, and two presented an OR of 1.01 for binary restenosis (BR). Conclusion: DCB demonstrated a comparable efficacy to drug-eluting stents (DES) in treating CAD, with relatively lower associated risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Coronary artery disease. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) vs. Drug-eluting stents (DES) was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR 0.66). Drug-coated balloon treatment demonstrated comparable efficacy to drug-eluting stents in treating coronary artery disease, with an odds ratio of 0.66 for target lesion revascularization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: