This analysis examines how crisis shapes authority and legitimacy in Feryal Ali Gauhar's novel, suggesting significant implications for understanding governance.
Drawing on Carl Schmitt’s concept of sovereignty and the state of exception, this study examines how Feryal Ali Gauhar’s An Abundance of Wild Roses represents authority, legitimacy, and decision-making in moments of crisis. Existing scholarship has largely approached the novel through ecofeminist, trauma, feminist, and posthumanist perspectives; however, limited attention has been paid to how exceptional situations produce legitimacy through sovereign acts of decision. Addressing this gap, the study conducts a close textual analysis of selected crisis scenes, including the arrival of the wounded stranger, the confinement of Sabiha, natural calamity, blocked roads, and the appearance of dead bodies. The study argues that the novel constructs sovereignty through figures capable of defining, interpreting, and managing exceptional situations, thereby transforming disruption into social order. It concludes that social and legal legitimacy in the narrative depends less on stable rules and traditional norms than on the authority of the decision-maker whose commands organize communal response when ordinary structures fail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arif et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: