Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review outlines historical evolution and contemporary tools in drug discovery, highlighting ethical issues.
Computer-aided drug discovery (CADD) has become an integral component of modern drug development, supporting hit identification, lead optimisation, and candidate refinement across both academia and industry. Over 4 decades of methodological progress have contributed to the discovery or optimisation of several approved therapeutics, establishing CADD as a crucial element of drug research. In parallel, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have introduced a new generation of practical tools that offer improved predictive performance, accessible software implementations, and increasing integration into everyday drug discovery and pharmacology workflows. This review provides a concise historical overview of CADD, with an updated account of approved drugs and clinical-stage candidates whose discovery or optimisation has involved computational methods and highlights a curated set of contemporary AI and ML tools that are readily usable by non-specialists. In addition, we compile and analyse two comprehensive, practice-oriented resources: a collection of cloud-based virtual-screening platforms, and an extensive suite of freely accessible ADMET prediction tools, offering medicinal chemists a consolidated guide to open-source computational workflows. Finally, we discuss emerging ethical considerations, including data bias, transparency, computational costs, and the environmental impact of large-scale models, outlining responsible paths for the continued adoption of AI in drug discovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clarke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: