Key result
72-h patch ECG detects ~198% more AF than 24-h Holter in ESUS patients.
Why the study?
Detecting AF is crucial to prevent recurrent stroke in ESUS, but prospective data directly comparing single-lead patch ECG with standard Holter monitoring remain limited.
Does 72-h patch ECG monitoring improve atrial fibrillation detection compared to 24-h Holter monitoring in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Cohort (n=113)
Yes
Does 72-h patch ECG monitoring improve atrial fibrillation detection compared to 24-h Holter monitoring in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 5.6%
p-value: p=0.002
Extended 72-hour single-lead patch ECG monitoring significantly improves the detection of short-duration atrial fibrillation compared to standard 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source.
Supports extended monitoring in ESUS; leaves open effects on recurrence and optimal strategy.
BACKGROUND: Detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for preventing stroke recurrence in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, prospective data directly comparing a single-lead patch electrocardiogram (ECG) with standard Holter monitoring remain limited. METHODS: The AVANT-GARDE trial was a prospective, multicenter study comparing a 72-h patch ECG with 24-h Holter monitoring. Among 113 acute ischemic stroke patients, 90 with ESUS formed the primary cohort, and 23 non-ESUS patients with left atrial enlargement were included as an ancillary cohort. Patients underwent simultaneous monitoring at baseline, with an additional 72-h patch monitoring at 6 months for the ESUS cohort. RESULTS: At baseline, AF was identified in 13.3% of the cohort, associated with larger LA size (41.8±5.1 mm vs. 38.3±5.9 mm; p=0.037). The 72-h patch ECG monitor demonstrated a higher AF detection rate at baseline than 24-h Holter in both the ESUS cohort (16.7% vs. 5.6%, p=0.002) and the overall cohort (14.2% vs. 4.4%, p=0.001). At 6 months, two additional AF episodes (any duration) were identified, increasing cumulative detection rates to 18.9% in the ESUS cohort and 15.9% in the overall cohort (p<0.001 vs. baseline Holter). However, the number of prolonged AF episodes lasting ≥30 seconds did not differ significantly between the two modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Extended patch ECG monitoring enhances the AF detection rate over conventional Holter in patients with ESUS. For short-duration AF (<30 seconds), it should be interpreted as an exploratory marker of subclinical atrial cardiopathy requiring long-term clinical surveillance. Large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these clinical findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) (n=113). 72-h patch ECG vs. 24-h Holter monitoring was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation detection rate at baseline (p=0.002). A 72-h patch ECG demonstrated a higher atrial fibrillation detection rate at baseline than 24-h Holter monitoring in patients with ESUS (16.7% vs. 5.6%, p=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: