Key result
Physical examination prior to arrival followed by FMD vaccination upon arrival minimized the probability of FMD outbreaks to 8.9% versus 33.5% with no exam and delayed vaccination.
Why the study?
Protocols for receiving replacement cattle vary widely in Egyptian beef farms, and introduction of new animals poses a major risk for foot and mouth disease outbreaks.
Does physical examination and immediate FMD vaccination reduce FMD outbreaks in Egyptian beef farms receiving replacement cattle?
Observational
Yes
Does physical examination and immediate FMD vaccination reduce FMD outbreaks in Egyptian beef farms receiving replacement cattle?
Physical examination of replacement cattle before arrival combined with immediate FMD vaccination minimizes the risk of FMD outbreaks in Egyptian feedlots.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May reduce FMD outbreak risk in beef herds; leaves open prospective validation of modeled strategies.
Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) is one of the most contagious and economically influential viral diseases on animal health and productivity. Introduction of newly purchased animals to beef farms constitutes a greater risk for the FMD outbreaks in endemic countries. Physical examination of newly purchased animals in live animal markets and/or at the receiving farm, and the timing of preventative FMD vaccination may reduce the risk of FMD outbreaks under endemic conditions. Small (< 50 animals) and medium (50-500 animals) sized beef farms in Egypt constitute more than 60% of the country's beef industry where protocols for receiving newly purchased animals vary widely between farms. The current risk analysis aimed to build a decision tree model to reduce FMD outbreaks associated with introduction of replacement cattle on Egypt's medium sized beef farms. Management practices explored were the use of physical examinations and FMD vaccination and their timing for replacements with the goal of reducing losses due to FMD outbreaks. A producer survey revealed that more than 50% of the study herds relied on live animal markets as a source for replacements and reported more FMD outbreaks (P-value=0.09), FMD herd morbidity > 50% (p-value=0.05), and weight loss > 15 kg/animal in FMD clinical cases (P-value=0.01) in comparison to herds that received replacements from other farms, imported, or purchased from small stakeholders. More than 70% of the surveyed farms received replacements ≤ 1year old and reported significantly higher FMD outbreaks (P-value=0.02) in comparison to farms that received older animals. More than 80% of the surveyed farms performed physical examination of newly purchased animals before arrival at their premises. Of the surveyed farms, 73% reported FMD outbreaks with 67% of the outbreaks being reported during the Fall and Winter seasons. The decision tree identified physical examination of newly purchased animals prior to arrival and mixing with a premises beef herd followed by vaccination against FMD upon arrival as the intervention resulting in the lowest probability of FMD outbreak (8.9%). In contrast, herds that did not perform physical examination and delay the FMD vaccination for two or more weeks had the highest probability of FMD outbreaks (33.5%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ElAshmawy et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Physical examination prior to arrival and FMD vaccination upon arrival vs. No physical examination and delayed FMD vaccination for two or more weeks was evaluated on Probability of FMD outbreak. Physical examination prior to arrival followed by FMD vaccination upon arrival minimized the probability of FMD outbreaks to 8.9% versus 33.5% with no exam and delayed vaccination.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: