Reveals how hydrogen-bond networks and electric fields influence gibberellin biosynthesis, indicating a potential cross-kingdom strategy.
Gibberellins are best known as plant hormones and are also biosynthesized in bacterial and fungal systems. Their biosynthesis hinges on a remarkable yet mechanistically controversial cytochrome P450−catalyzed oxidative B-ring contraction that converts the 6- 6 - ent -kaurane scaffold into the characteristic 6- 5 - ent -gibberellane scaffold. While pinacol/semi-pinacol rearrangement via a discrete carbocation has long been hypothesized, the precise orchestration of this complex transformation by enzymes such as bacterial CYP114 has remained elusive. Here, we integrate MD simulations with QM/MM calculations to resolve this debate, revealing that CYP114 catalyzes this ring contraction via a concerted, asynchronous proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET)-triggered rearrangement pathway rather than a stepwise pathway involving a discrete carbocation intermediate. More importantly, this transformation is governed by a cooperative control strategy: (i) a clamp-like local hydrogen-bond network that preorganizes the substrate to enforce selective C6−Hβ abstraction while suppressing canonical oxygen rebound, albeit at an energetic cost; and (ii) a strongly oriented internal electric field that compensates for this penalty and selectively stabilizes the charge-redistribution transition state essential for skeletal rearrangement. Comparative analyses of representative fungal and plant homologs suggest that this combination of geometric preorganization and electrostatic assistance may represent a conserved cross-kingdom strategy by which GA-producing P450s promote noncanonical ring contraction. Beyond clarifying the catalytic logic underlying this conserved skeletal remodeling step in gibberellin biosynthesis, these findings reveal how P450s can redirect canonical C−H oxygenation chemistry toward noncanonical oxidative rearrangement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: