Key result
Baseline ventricular pacing linked to ~490% higher AF progression risk in adults with CHD.
Why the study?
AF is increasingly prevalent in adults with congenital heart disease, but predictors of AF progression remain poorly defined.
What are the risk factors for atrial fibrillation progression in adults with congenital heart disease?
Cohort (n=125)
What are the risk factors for atrial fibrillation progression in adults with congenital heart disease?
Hazard Ratio: 5.9 (95% CI 2.5–13.7)
p-value: p=<0.001
In adults with congenital heart disease, female sex, mild/moderate CHD complexity, and baseline ventricular pacing are independent risk factors for progression from paroxysmal to persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation.
Hypothesis-generating for AF progression predictors in CHD adults; larger prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF) progression in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), a population in which AF is increasingly prevalent yet predictors of progression remain poorly defined. METHODS: Adults with CHD and AF (N = 125) were followed for 17 ± 8 years. AF progression was defined as transition from paroxysmal to persistent/permanent AF. Coexisting atrial tachycardia, permanent pacing modes, and longitudinal changes in QRS duration (QRSd) and corrected QT interval (QTc) were evaluated. Time-dependent Cox regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to identify risk factors for AF progression. RESULTS: AF progression occurred in 57 (45.6%) patients after a median of 5 (range: 0-30) years. Both QRSd and QTc prolongation were more pronounced in CHD patients with AF progression (AF progression ΔQRSd: + 11 ms, ΔQTc: + 28 ms, no-AF progression: ΔQRSd: + 7 ms, ΔQTc: + 11 ms, P < 0.05, respectively). Independent risk factors for AF progression included female sex (HR[95%CI] 2.3[1.3-3.9], P = 0.003), mild or moderate CHD complexity (HR[95%CI] 5.5[2.3-13.1], P < 0.001, and 4.4[1.8-11.0], P = 0.002) and baseline ventricular pacing (HR[95%CI] 5.9[2.5-13.7], P < 0.001). Similar associations were observed in Fine-Gray analyses accounting for death. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with CHD, AF progression is common and associated with more pronounced ventricular electrical remodeling. Both modifiable (pacing mode) and intrinsic (sex and CHD complexity) risk factors are related to AF progression. These findings enable identification of high-risk CHD patients for AF progression and provide a foundation for future studies on targeted monitoring or treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease with atrial fibrillation (n=125). Baseline ventricular pacing vs. No baseline ventricular pacing was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation progression (transition from paroxysmal to persistent/permanent AF) (HR 5.9, 95% CI 2.5-13.7, p=<0.001). In adults with congenital heart disease, baseline ventricular pacing (HR 5.9; 95% CI 2.5-13.7; P<0.001), female sex, and mild/moderate CHD complexity independently predicted AF progression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: