Key result
Ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry using a peak ratio ≥0.75 yielded 86.24% accuracy and 99.24% specificity for diagnosing preeclampsia.
Why the study?
The accuracy and optimal cutoff values for ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry indexes in patients diagnosed with preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnant women needed to be established.
Does ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry accurately diagnose preeclampsia compared to healthy pregnant women?
Case-Control (n=268)
Does ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry accurately diagnose preeclampsia compared to healthy pregnant women?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OA Doppler cutoffs may support PE detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Objectives To calculate the accuracy (A) and establish the best cutoff value for ophthalmic artery (OA) Doppler velocimetry indexes in patients diagnosed with preeclampsia (PE), compared with healthy pregnant women.Methods This prospective experimental study enrolled 268 women: 133 with PE and 135 healthy pregnant women. All patients were evaluated by OA Doppler sonography, bilaterally, to assess their pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), peak systolic velocity (PVS), second peak systolic velocity (P2), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and peak ratio (PR). Means were compared using Student’s T-test. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve was used to establish the cutoff value and estimate the sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), accuracy (A) of all variables, and a significance of 95% was adopted.Results ROC curve analysis showed that P2 and PR were superior to the other parameters for PE diagnosis. We tested two cutoff values: (1) using PR ≥0.70, obtained A: 88.72%, S: 81.95%, and Sp: 95.48% and (2) using PR ≥0.75, and A: 86.24%, S: 74.43%, and Sp: 99.24%. By adopting P2 ≥ 21.5 cm/s, we obtained A: 87.59%, S: 84.96%, and Sp: 90.22% and when the cutoff point was P2 ≥ 22 cm/s, there was a slight decrease in A to 86.46% and S to 81.20%, with Sp: 91.89.3%.Conclusion Ophthalmic artery Doppler demonstrated to be an effective and high-performance imaging method for the diagnosis of PE and the indexes P2 and PR demonstrated superior accuracy to the other Doppler parameters assessed. Higher performance occurred when the cutoff values with greater specificity were adopted, PR ≥ 0.75 and P2 ≥ 22 cm/s, considering that the proposed OA Doppler is to be a complementary method for preeclampsia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diniz et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Preeclampsia (n=268). Ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry vs. Healthy pregnant women was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry indexes for preeclampsia. Ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry using a peak ratio ≥0.75 yielded 86.24% accuracy and 99.24% specificity for diagnosing preeclampsia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: