Key result
Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters, including time-averaged mean peak velocities (SMD 1.79; 95% CI 0.87-2.71; p=0.0001), were significantly different in women with preeclampsia versus controls.
Why the study?
Preeclampsia is a progressive and severe cardiovascular disorder in pregnant women, warranting determination of the potential significance of ophthalmic Doppler parameters.
Do ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters differ between women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women?
Meta-Analysis
Do ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters differ between women with preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women?
Standardized Mean Difference: 1.79 (95% CI 0.87–2.71)
p-value: p=0.0001
Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters, specifically time-averaged mean peak velocities, pulsatility index, and end-diastolic velocities, show significant differences in women with preeclampsia compared to normotensive pregnancies, suggesting potential utility in evaluating central vascular hemodynamics.
May support ophthalmic artery Doppler in preeclampsia assessment; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
Preeclampsia is a progressive and severe cardiovascular disorder in pregnant women. To determine the potential significance of ophthalmic Doppler parameters in preeclamptic women and to provide evidence‐based hints for clinical practice and scientific investigation. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library till July 31, 2022. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random effects model. Heterogeneity across included studies was evaluated utilizing the Q test and I 2 statistic. We identified 8 observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled SMD for peak systolic velocities (PSV) was .12 (95% CI: −.82, 1.06, p = .8071; I 2 = 94%, p < .0001). The overall SMD for time‐averaged mean peak velocities (MV) was 1.79 (95% CI: .87, 2.71, p = .0001; I 2 = 60%, p = .1152). Regarding the pulsatility index (PI), the pooled SMD was −2.05 (95% CI: −3.12, −.98, p = .0002; I 2 = 92%, p < .0001). Overall SMD for end‐diastolic velocities (EDV) was 1.11 (95% CI: .23, 1.98, p = .0136; I 2 = 92%, p < .0001). The pooled SMDs for resistance index (RI) and peak ratio (PR) was −.18 (95% CI: −1.90, 1.53, p = .8333; I 2 = 96%, p < .0001) and 1.46 (95% CI: −1.30, 4.22, p = .2994; I 2 = 99%, p < .0001), respectively. Publication bias was not identified. MV, PI, and EDV showed significant differences between patients with preeclampsia and non‐hypertensive pregnant participants. Studies on the predictive performance of ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in preeclampsia. Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters vs. non-hypertensive pregnant participants was evaluated on time-averaged mean peak velocities (MV) (SMD 1.79, 95% CI 0.87-2.71, p=0.0001). Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters, including time-averaged mean peak velocities (SMD 1.79; 95% CI 0.87-2.71; p=0.0001), were significantly different in women with preeclampsia versus controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: