Key result
Colchicine /day for 12 months did not improve Fat Attenuation Index in the LAD or RCA compared to control.
Why the study?
Colchicine reduces cardiovascular outcomes through anti-inflammatory action, but its effect on reducing coronary inflammation via the Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) on coronary CT angiography required evaluation.
Does colchicine reduce coronary inflammation assessed by Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) in patients with elevated FAI?
RCT (n=40)
Open-label
randomized
No
Does colchicine reduce coronary inflammation assessed by Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) in patients with elevated FAI?
In this interim analysis, colchicine 0.5 mg/day for 12 months did not significantly improve coronary inflammation as measured by perivascular Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) on coronary CT angiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Colchicine does not reduce coronary inflammation; leaves open its role pending larger randomized trials.
Inflammation is an important pillar of atherogenesis in coronary disease. Studies have documented the prognostic power of measuring the attenuation of coronary perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) and its good correlation as an early inflammatory biomarker in the atherogenesis process. Colchicine, a medication with well-documented anti-inflammatory action and with an impact on reducing cardiovascular outcomes, may influence reducing FAI (Fat Attenuation index) assessed by coronary tomography angiography. This study aims to evaluate the effect of colchicine in reducing coronary inflammation after 12 months of using the medication. Methods: Single- center, randomized, prospective, open, ongoing study, carried out at the Heart Institute of the University of São Paulo (InCor HCFMUSP). Forty patients with documentation of FAI ≥ 70 HU in the right coronary artery (RCA) and/or left descending artery (LAD) were randomized to receive colchicine 0.5 mg/day for a period of 12 months. The primary outcome was the quantification of FAI in both therapeutic groups (colchicine and control) after a 12-month follow-up. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the variation in total atheroma volume, calcium score, progression or regression of high plaque findings, variation low attenuation plaque volume and clinical outcomes. Results: Forty patients were included between May 2021 to April 2023, of which 22 were in the Colchicine group and 18 in the Control group. As a primary outcome, no FAI improvement in RCA and LAD was documented after a 12-month follow-up. In the Colchicine group, the mean FAI in initial LAD of −70.37 ± 7.1 HU improved to −72.90 ± 6.2 HU, but without statistical significance (p = 0.82) and Control group −69,13 ± 7,7 HU to −71,73 ± 6,3 HU (p= 0,64). FAI RCA from − 67.69 ± 5.4 HU to −71.23 ± 4.7 HU, without significance (p = 0.10) in Colchicine group and – 65,48 ± 5,5 HU to −69,08 ± 7,8 HU (p = 0,19) in control group. Conclusion: To date, a total of 40 patients have been randomized. In this interim analysis, with 50% of the sample already undergoing control coronary CT angiography, no association was observed with the use of colchicine and improvement in coronary inflammation after 12 months of using the medication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbosa et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Coronary disease (n=40). Colchicine vs. Control was evaluated on Quantification of Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) after a 12-month follow-up. Colchicine /day for 12 months did not improve Fat Attenuation Index in the LAD or RCA compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: