Key result
Low-dose colchicine did not significantly reduce pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation compared to placebo (adjusted difference -1.0 HU, p=0.236) in patients with chronic coronary disease.
Why the study?
Low-dose colchicine reduces major cardiovascular events in coronary disease, but its mechanism of action is not fully understood.
Does low-dose colchicine alter pericoronary inflammation and coronary plaque composition in patients with chronic coronary disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=151)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does low-dose colchicine alter pericoronary inflammation and coronary plaque composition in patients with chronic coronary disease?
Mean Difference: -1 (95% CI -2.7–0.7)
Absolute Event Rate: -79.5% vs -78.7%
p-value: p=0.236
Low-dose colchicine in chronic coronary disease is associated with increased dense calcified plaque volume, suggesting a mechanism of plaque stabilization, without significant changes in pericoronary inflammation.
No difference in pericoronary inflammation seen; leaves open whether colchicine promotes plaque stabilization in chronic coronary disease.
Background Low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events in coronary disease, but its mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. We investigated whether low-dose colchicine is associated with changes in pericoronary inflammation and plaque composition in patients with chronic coronary disease. Methods We performed a cross-sectional, nationwide, subanalysis of the Low-Dose Colchicine 2 Trial (LoDoCo2, n=5522). CT angiography studies were performed in 151 participants randomised to colchicine or placebo after a median treatment duration of 28.2 months. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation measurements around proximal coronary artery segments and quantitative plaque analysis for the entire coronary tree were performed using artificial intelligence-enabled plaque analysis software. Results Median PCAT attenuation was not significantly different between the two groups (−79.5 Hounsfield units (HU) for colchicine versus −78.7 HU for placebo, p=0.236). Participants assigned to colchicine had a higher volume (169.6 mm 3 vs 113.1 mm 3 , p=0.041) and burden (9.6% vs 7.0%, p=0.035) of calcified plaque, and higher volume of dense calcified plaque (192.8 mm 3 vs 144.3 mm 3 , p=0.048) compared with placebo, independent of statin therapy. Colchicine treatment was associated with a lower burden of low-attenuation plaque in participants on a low-intensity statin, but not in those on a high-intensity statin (p interaction =0.037). Conclusions Pericoronary inflammation did not differ among participants who received low-dose colchicine compared with placebo. Low-dose colchicine was associated with a higher volume of calcified plaque, particularly dense calcified plaque, which is considered a feature of plaque stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic coronary disease (n=151). Colchicine vs. Placebo was evaluated on Between-group difference in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation (Adjusted difference -1.0 HU, 95% CI -2.7 to 0.7, p=0.236). Low-dose colchicine did not significantly reduce pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation compared to placebo (adjusted difference -1.0 HU, p=0.236) in patients with chronic coronary disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: