Preprint proposes a new definition of law as a constraint that persists across various domains, suggesting broader implications for multiple disciplines.
This preprint proposes a domain-independent definition of law as an invariant admissibility constraint. A law, in the strict sense, is not merely an empirical regularity, formal expression, model, rule, norm, or protocol. It is a constraint that determines what remains admissible within a specified domain and whose status is preserved under admissible transformations of regime. The paper develops a minimal formal vocabulary for distinguishing law from adjacent structures and proposes a practical diagnostic: what disappears with a regime, and what remains admissible after transformation? The framework is intended as a methodological classification tool applicable across philosophy of science, physics, biology, computation, economics, constitutional analysis, institutional systems, and complex systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vien Nguyen Son (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: