Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses meteorological forcing dataset for arid regions, highlighting improved data accuracy.
Hydroclimatic assessment in Xinjiang is constrained by sparse observations, complex terrain and systematic biases in widely used gridded and reanalysis products. Here we present the Three-Dimensional Variational Xinjiang Meteorological Forcing Dataset (3DVAR-MF-XJ), a 0.1° gridded near-surface dataset for 1961–2020 at hourly and daily resolution, including 2 m air temperature, relative humidity, 10 m wind speed, surface pressure, downward shortwave radiation and precipitation. 3DVAR-MF-XJ is generated using a hybrid framework in which regional modelling with three-dimensional variational data assimilation first produces dynamically consistent fields (3DVAR-XJ), followed by station-constrained bias correction on a common 0.1° grid. Evaluation against 30 withheld stations and independent benchmark products shows reduced mean and root-mean-square errors, higher correlations, and improved representation of precipitation over complex terrain and shortwave radiation at high elevations relative to ERA5, ERA5-Land and CN05.1. For precipitation, RMSE is reduced by 65.6%, 64.9% and 49.3% relative to ERA5, ERA5-Land and CN05.1, respectively. 3DVAR-MF-XJ provides a unified, well-documented forcing dataset for hydrological, ecological and land–atmosphere applications in arid Xinjiang.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: