Examines decision support perception linked to generative AI in tourism services, highlighting cognitive effects.
With the growing adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platforms in tourism services, their generative and interactive capabilities are reshaping how users evaluate decision support. However, the mechanisms underlying these evaluations remain unclear. Drawing on large-scale user review data, this study examines structural relationships and configurational patterns using text mining, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA), and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). The results indicate that improvements in functionality and interaction do not necessarily enhance decision support perception. When outputs require additional user effort for filtering and adjustment, they may increase cognitive burden and reduce perceived effectiveness. No single condition is necessary for high-level outcomes; instead, evaluations emerge from the joint influence of multiple factors. High decision support perception can arise under both high-functionality and high-interaction conditions, as well as low-complexity and low-interaction contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: